Appeal No. 2000-0784
Application No. 08/995,507
facie case of obviousness. Accordingly, for those reasons, we
have determined that the examiner's further rejections of
claims 1, 6 through 10, 11, 12 and 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being obvious over Nakamura in view of Rohanna will not be
sustained.
In light of the foregoing, we have refused to sustain
each and every one of the examiner's rejections before us on
appeal. Thus, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1,
6 through 15 and 22 through 24 of the present application
under either
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007