Appeal No. 2000-0818 Page 5
Application No. 08/949,917
It is our conclusion that, with regard to both issues raised in the rejection, the
disclosure is sufficient to indicate to the artisan that the inventor was in possession of the
claimed invention at the time the application was filed.
SUMMARY
The rejection is not sustained.
The decision of the examiner is REVERSED.
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOHN P. McQUADE ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOHN F. GONZALES )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007