Ex parte KLING et al. - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                            Paper No. 49              

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                     Ex parte ROBERT KLING and BERTH-OVE WALL                         
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2000-0855                                  
                             Application No. 08/597,377                               
                                   ______________                                     
                              Heard: February 21, 2001                                
                                   _______________                                    

          Before COHEN, McQUADE and GONZALES, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   

               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner's final              
          rejection of claims 1 and 3 through 25, which are all of the                
          claims remaining in the application.1                                       
               We AFFIRM-IN-PART.                                                     


               1 Claim 11 was amended subsequent to the final rejection. See Paper    
          No. 34.                                                                     
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007