Appeal No. 2000-0897
Application No. 08/570,373
In that appellant has stated that all the claims stand or
fall together, the standing rejection of claims 3-5, 8, 9, 11-
13, 22 and 23 as being unpatentable over Carpentier in view of
Wain, and the standing rejection of claims 6, 7, 14 and 15 as
being unpatentable over Carpentier in view of Wain and Angell,
are also sustained.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JEFFREY V. NASE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
LJS:hh
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007