Appeal No. 2000-0902 Application No. 08/804,466 We have carefully reviewed the Daley reference additionally applied in the rejection of claim 4, and the Krauss reference additionally applied in the rejection of claims 5 and 7-12, but find nothing therein to render obvious what we have found to be lacking in Zachry and Currie. We therefore shall not sustain either of these rejections. Conclusion Each of the examiner’s rejections is reversed. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JOHN P. McQUADE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) LJS:hh 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007