Appeal Number: 2000-0907 Application Number: 08/770,320 must then notify the applicant that the examiner has denied the amendment entry via an advisory action form PTO-303. Once this has been done, the examiner must then return the application to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences for a decision on appealed claims 1-6. If the examiner considers it appropriate to enter the amendment, he or she will have two choices as noted above. If the examiner enters the amendment, and indicates that the amendment is allowable, the examiner must return the application to the Board of Patent Appeals for a decision on appealed claims 1-6. If the examiner enters the amendment, and reopens prosecution, the examiner must return the application to the Board of Appeals and Interferences, so that the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences can vacate the appeal number. Once the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences have vacated the appeal number, The Board will return the application to the examiner, for prosecution. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the application is remanded to the Examiner for: 1) consideration of the amendment filed September 26, 1997; 2) for notification of said consideration to the applicant; 3) for handling of the amendment and application as noted above; and 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007