The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ERNST LISSEL and MATIA BINFET-KULL ____________ Appeal No. 2000-0916 Application No. 08/907,965 ____________ HEARD: February 21, 2001 ____________ Before FRANKFORT, NASE, and LAZARUS, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 7 to 11, 13, 14 and 19 to 21. Claims 3 to 6 and 15 to 18 have been objected to as depending from aPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007