Appeal No. 2000-0941 Page 14 Application No. 09/077,362 To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11 and 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Cadmus is reversed; the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Koller is reversed; the decision of the examiner to reject claims 3 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Cadmus is reversed; and the decision of the examiner to reject claims 3, 11 and 12Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007