Ex parte MIRZA - Page 1




                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                      for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.      

                                                                 Paper No. 27         

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                              Ex parte MUHAMMAD Z. MIRZA                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2000-0951                                 
                              Application No. 08/640,160                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, McQUADE              
          and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                     

          NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 1, 4 to 6, 11, 14 to 16, 18 to 21, 25 and               
          28 to 33, which are all of the claims pending in this                       
          application.1                                                               


               1 Claims 4, 16 and 18 were amended subsequent to the final             
          rejection.                                                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007