The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LAURENCE BURST SPERRY, ANTHONY ORKIN DAVLIN,
KERRY MICHAEL MCKINLEY and GEORGE TEOPFILIUS BERTRAM
____________
Appeal No. 2000-1267
Application No. 08/843,274
____________
HEARD: February 22, 2001
____________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-15.
Claims 27-37 were withdrawn by the examiner as being directed to a non-elected
invention, and claims 16-26 were canceled by the appellants.
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007