Appeal No. 2000-1298 Application 08/938,779 Appellants’ invention is directed to a baffle preform for use in the manufacture of a heat exchanger with a baffled, tubular header. Independent claim 10 is representative of the subject matter on appeal and a copy of that claim may be found in the Appendix to appellants’ brief. The prior art references relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Knocke 3,269,582 Aug. 30, 1966 Gire 5,450,667 Sept. 19, 1995 Claims 10 through 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the combined teachings of Knocke and Gire. Rather than attempt to reiterate the examiner's full commentary with regard to the above-noted rejection and the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and appellants regarding the rejection, we make reference to the examiner's 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007