Appeal No. 2000-1333
Application No. 08/691,988
depend therefrom, as being unpatentable over Adrian in view of
Hubble.
Furthermore, inasmuch as Woolard does not overcome the
foregoing flaw in the basic Adrian-Hubble combination, we
shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of
claim 5, which depends from claim 4, as being unpatentable
over Adrian in view of Hubble and Woolard.
SUMMARY
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 and 3
through 5 is reversed.
REVERSED
)
IRWIN CHARLES COHEN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LAWRENCE J. STAAB )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
JOHN P. McQUADE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007