Ex parte HANDWERKER - Page 6




          Appeal No. 2000-1413                                                        
          Application No. 08/650,883                                                  


          toward the lower layer of the pool cover back into the pool                 
          water, as required in appellant's claim 31, but will instead                
          allow that heat energy to be transmitted through the over-                  
          layer (9) and trapped within the air space (10), thereby                    
          creating the "green house" effect desired in Yellott.  Thus,                
          the pool cover of Yellott does not anticipate the multi-layer               
          pool cover set forth in appellant's claim 31 on                             


          appeal and the examiner's rejection of claim 31 under 35                    
          U.S.C.                                                                      
          § 102(b) based on Yellott will not be sustained.                            


          It follows from our determination above that the                            
          examiner's rejection of dependent claims 2, 4, 29, 33 and 34                
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Yellott will also                
          not be sustained, since these claims include all of the                     
          limitations of independent claim 31.                                        


          Turning to the examiner's rejection of claims 6, 9, 11,                     
          30 and 32 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                  
          Yellott in view of Wilson, we note that the examiner now seeks              
                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007