Ex parte JOHNSON et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-1415                                                        
          Application 09/197,947                                                      


               Appellants’ invention pertains to a toilet sealing ring                
          adapter assembly for use in forming a connection to a sewer                 
          pipe. A basic understanding of the invention can be derived                 
          from a reading of exemplary claim 20, a copy of which appears               
          in the APPENDIX to the brief (Paper No. 11).                                


               As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the               
          documents listed below:                                                     
          Gaddy                    3,012,252                     Dec. 12,             
                                                                 1961                 
          Pickard                  3,501,172                     Mar. 17,             
                                                                 1970                 
          Izzi, Sr.                     4,482,161                     Nov.            
                                                                      13,             
                                                                      1984            



               The following rejection is before us for review.                       


               Claims 20 and 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as               
          being unpatentable over Pickard, Gaddy, and Izzi, Sr.                       


               The full text of the examiner’s rejection and response to              
          the argument presented by appellants appears in the answer                  

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007