Appeal No. 2000-1444 Page 6
Application No. 09/040,245
and Held fail to establish a prima facie case of obviousness with respect to the method
recited in claim 1, and we will not sustain the rejection of this claim or, it follows, of claims
2-10, which depend therefrom.
Independent claim 11 sets forth the invention in somewhat different terms, but
contains the same limitations. On the basis of the rationale expressed above with regard
to claim 1, we also will not sustain the rejection of claims 11-18.
SUMMARY
The rejection is not sustained.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007