Ex parte ITO et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-1469                                                        
          Application 08/808,789                                                      


          the form of the top of an automobile” (specification, page 1).              
          Representative claims 20 and 21 read as follows:                            
               20.  An automotive sunshade panel comprising a metallic                
          hollow panel having longitudinal edges and flanged portions                 
          provided along the longitudinal edges, the metallic hollow                  
          panel having a two-dimensionally curved surface formed at a                 
          central portion thereof and comprising first and second metal               
          sheet members, said first metal sheet member being provided                 
          above said second metal sheet member and directly bonded                    
          thereto to form a plurality of segregated, longitudinally                   
          extending, parallel passageways therebetween.                               
               21.  An automotive sunshade panel comprising a metallic                
          hollow panel having longitudinal edges and flanged portions                 
          provided along the longitudinal edges, the metallic hollow                  
          panel having a three-dimensionally curved surface formed at a               
          central portion thereof and comprising first and second metal               
          sheet members, said first metal sheet member being provided                 
          above said second metal sheet member and directly bonded                    
          thereto to form a plurality of segregated, longitudinally                   
          extending, parallel passageways therebetween.                               
                                  THE PRIOR ART                                       
               The items relied on by the examiner as evidence of                     
          obviousness are:                                                            
          Trout                       1,625,061           Apr. 19, 1927               
          Molin et al. (Molin)        3,534,463           Oct. 20, 1970               
          Haraga et al. (Haraga)      4,414,257           Nov.  8, 1983               
          Mori et al. (Mori)          5,356,695           Oct. 18, 1994               
               The admission on page 2 of the appellants’ specification               
          that fabrics typically are laminated to the curved surfaces of              
          automotive sunshade panels (the admitted prior art).                        




                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007