Ex Parte STORER - Page 3




              Appeal No. 2000-1477                                                                  Page 3                
              Application No. 08/654,739                                                                                  


                     The appellant’s invention relates generally to grille guards for vehicles, and more                  
              particularly to a grill guard having a footstep for enhancing the access to the hood and                    
              engine compartment of trucks and sport utility vehicles, which often are high off of the                    
              ground.  As manifested in independent claim 1, the invention comprises at least one                         
              horizontal grille guard member, at least one vertical grille guard member attached to the                   
              horizontal member, and a footstep attached to the vertical member proximate a lower                         
              end thereof in such a fashion, and of such construction, as to support the weight of a                      
              person.  The step comprises a generally tubular horizontal member formed of a                               
              material sufficient to resist bending under a person’s weight, and an integrated flattened                  
              portion formed on the tubular member for providing a user with a structural “visual                         
              queue”1 that the flattened portion is to be used for stepping upon.                                         
                     The examiner has taken the position that the subject matter of claim 1 is                            
              unpatentable over the grille guard shown on page 3 of Go Rhino.  In arriving at this                        
              conclusion, the examiner expresses the view that the lowermost horizontal component                         
              shown in the illustration is “capable” of being used as a step, and that it would have                      
              been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to form it as a tubular member having an                   
              integrated flattened portion in view of the steps shown on the side of the truck on page                    

                     1It appears to us that “queue” should be “cue,” in that the common applicable                        
              definitions of the former seem to be far removed from the meaning the appellant                             
              attaches to it, while that of the latter is “a feature indicating the nature of something                   
              perceived.”  Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, Tenth Edition, 1996, pages 958                        
              and 282.                                                                                                    







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007