Appeal No. 2000-1503
Application 08/655,126
has been inputted by the calling party; and
transmitting a received message corresponding to the
received selection number from the local facsimile machine to
the facsimile machine of the calling party when the received
message selection number has been inputted by the calling
party.
The references relied on by the examiner are:
Fuller et al. (Fuller) 5,224,156 June 29,
1993
Gordon et al. (Gordon) 5,291,302 Mar. 1,
1994
Claims 1 through 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103(a) as being unpatentable over Fuller in view of Gordon.
Reference is made to the briefs and the answer for the
respective positions of the appellant and the examiner.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the entire record before us,
and we will reverse the obviousness rejection of claims 1
through 8.
Fuller teaches that facsimile messages may be sent from
one location to another in a confidential manner. Appellant
-3-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007