Ex parte HOPE - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2000-1612                                                         
          Application 08/938,844                                                       


               relates to a removable support platform for a chair’s                   
               armrest on which a mouse and its pad may be placed.  To                 
               attached [sic] the platform to the armrest, the platform                
               extension oriented parallel to the armrest has one or two               
               spaced straps that can encircle the chairs arm and be                   
               fixed thereon.  The strap or straps each may have hook                  
               and loop (VELCO TM) ends or the like.  Screws or other                  
               strap retainers extend into the strap through the                       
               platform’s extension member to fix the members together.                


          Independent claim 7 is representative of the subject                         
          matter on appeal and a copy of that claim, as it appears in                  
          the Appendix to appellant’s brief, is attached to this                       
          decision.                                                                    


          The prior art references relied upon by the examiner in                      
          rejecting the appealed claims are:                                           
               Thompson et al. (Thompson)     5,474,272           Dec. 12,             
          1995                                                                         
                   Bourassa                       5,848,773           Dec.            
          15, 1998                                                                     
          (filed Apr. 17,                                                              
          1997)                                                                        


               Claim 7 is said by the examiner to stand rejected under                 
          35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by or, in the alternative,                 


                                           3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007