Ex parte BORGES et al. - Page 1




                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                      for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.      

                                                                 Paper No. 14         

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                          Ex parte JOHN SILVA BORGES et al.                           
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2000-1634                                 
                              Application No. 09/093,279                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before FRANKFORT, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 1 to 6, which are all of the claims                     
          pending in this application.1                                               


               We REVERSE.                                                            


               1 Claims 1 and 4 were amended subsequent to the final                  
          rejection.                                                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007