Ex parte MROTZ et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-1660                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/868,081                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellants' invention relates to an overhead storage               
          unit for use with modular office systems (specification, p.                 
          1).  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the                  
          appendix to the appellants' brief.                                          


               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Aylworth                 RE 28,994                     Oct.  5,             
          1976                                                                        
          White                    5,022,541                     June 11,             
          1991                                                                        



               Claims 19 to 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                
          being unpatentable over Aylworth in view of White.                          


               Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced              
          by the examiner and the appellants regarding the above-noted                
          rejection, we make reference to the answer (Paper No. 16,                   
          mailed May 7, 1999) for the examiner's complete reasoning in                
          support of the rejection, and to the brief (Paper No. 15,                   









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007