Ex parte BERG et al. - Page 2





          Appeal No. 2000-1669                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/433,328                                                  



                                    THE INVENTION                                     

               The appellants' invention relates to an oblong spacer to               

          be used in conjunction with a metered dose inhaler                          

          (specification, page 1).  Claims 16 and 17 read as follows:1                


          16. A spacer for use with a metered dose inhaler (MDI),                     
          comprising a continuous solid metal body which defines a                    
          chamber having a total volume of between 50 and 400 ml,                     
          wherein said body has a generally oblong shape which is                     
          rotationally symmetrical about a longitudinal axis and an                   
          opening at each end, one of the openings being adapted for                  
          connection to a metered dose inhaler (MDI).                                 

          17. The spacer of claim 16, wherein the body is composed of                 
          stainless steel.                                                            



                                    THE PRIOR ART                                     

               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  

          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              

          Kraemer                      5,427,089           Jun. 27, 1995             
                                                   (filed Sep.  8, 1993)              
          Calvert et al. (Calvert)           5,522,383           Jun.  4,             
          1996                                                                        

                                                                                     
          1 Applicants' amendment (Paper No. 16), filed October 8, 1998, prior to the 
          final rejection (Paper No. 18), includes changes to claim 16, the abstract and
          the specification.  Notwithstanding the examiner's approval of entry of this
          amendment (See Paper No. 18), we note that the record does not show that the
          amendment has been formally entered.  Nevertheless, because the examiner has
          indicated that the correct reading of claim 16 is that which is found in the
          appendix to the brief, we shall treat the copy of claim 16 in the brief as  
          being the correct one for purposes of deciding this appeal.                 








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007