Ex parte GODSHALL - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.           
                                                                 Paper No. 10         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                              Ex parte NED ALLEN GODSHALL                             
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2000-1682                                 
                              Application No. 08/845,503                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before CALVERT, STAAB, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 1 through 7 and 10 through 12.                          
               The appellant's invention relates to a method and                      
          apparatus for the transdermal delivery of a compound.  An                   
          understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading                
          of exemplary claims 1 and 4, which appear in the appendix to                
          the appellant's brief.                                                      








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007