The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte HIROKAZU IDE, AKIO KOBAYASHI, HIDEFUMI OKADA,
HARUHIKO MURATA, ATSUSHI KOBAYASHI,
TOMIO ISHIGAMI and YASUHIKO NAITO
_____________
Appeal No. 2000-1735
Application No. 08/780,930
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, KRASS and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-7, all of the claims
remaining in the application.
The invention is directed to a digital video camera. More particularly, the camera
has two modes: a normal mode wherein all charges in the entire line produced
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007