Ex parte PUGH - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-1746                                                        
          Application 08/791,098                                                      


          and 2, the support is formed of wire bent into a configuration              
          that includes a number of closed loops (24) surrounding a                   
          central opening. Independent claim 1 is representative of the               
          subject matter on appeal and a copy of that claim can be found              
          in the Appendix to appellant’s brief.                                       


          The prior art references of record relied upon by the                       
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Baldwin                       603,754             May 10, 1898              
          Krumholz                      1,775,203           Sep. 9, 1930              
          Lang (Great Britain)          233,075             May  7, 1925              


          Claims 1 through 6, 13 and 14 stand rejected under 35                       
          U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Krumholz in view of              
          Baldwin.                                                                    


          Claims 7 through 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                        
          103(a) as being unpatentable over Krumholz in view of Baldwin               
          as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Lang (GB                
          233,075).                                                                   



                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007