The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RAZIEL LURIE
__________
Appeal No. 2000-1751
Application 08/530,264
__________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, HARKCOM, Vice Chief
Administrative Patent Judge, and WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
REMAND TO THE EXAMINER
Our consideration of the record leads us to conclude that this case is not in
condition for a decision on appeal. Accordingly, we remand the application to the
examiner to consider the following issues and to take appropriate action.
1. Representative Claim
Claim 6 is representative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows:
6. Method for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia, which comprises
administering to a human in need of said treatment, an effective amount of relaxin.
2. Improper Examiner's Answer
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007