Appeal No. 2000-1844 Page 6
Application No. 08/506,794
not have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a
person having ordinary skill in the art. In that regard, it
is our opinion that the combined teachings of L'Esperance and
Ruiz are not suggestive of the "third anterior surface annular
region" as recited in claim 7.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007