Ex parte SAUNDERS et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 2000-1905                                                         
          Design Application 29/095,094                                                
          'ornamental' ) was not created for the purpose of                            
          ornamenting."                                                                

          Analysis                                                                     
               Appellants argue that the equidistant spacing of the                    
          groups of gripping knobs around the strap together with the                  
          fact that they are grouped in a 3-by-3 pattern and the                       
          pyramidal shape of the gripping knobs with rounded tops are                  
          pure design features (Brief, Paper No. 9, p. 4).  Appellants                 
          filed a declaration  (attached to Paper No. 5) by Robert                     
          Jacoff, Vice President of the assignee, Great Neck Saw                       
          Manufacturers, Inc.  Mr. Jacoff states that the knob pattern,                
          spacing, and shape of the knobs give the design a distinctive                
          ornamental appearance and states that changes could be made                  
          which would not affect the function, but would affect the                    
          aesthetic appearance.  Appellants further argue that the prior               
          patents cited by the Examiner together with those submitted by               
          Appellants in the Information Disclosure Statement (IDS)                     
          (Paper No. 2 ) disclose numerous configurations of oil filter2                                                                

            Although the Information Disclosure Statement was2                                                                       
          given Paper No. 2, it was not entered on the file wrapper                    
          contents and, consequently, the first Office action was also                 
          given Paper No. 2.  The Examiner should have this clerical                   
          problem corrected by, e.g., having the Information Disclosure                
                                        - 5 -                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007