Appeal No. 2000-1948 Page 16 Application No. 08/751,087 teachings of the applied prior art would not have taught or suggested the step of providing a detent to prevent continuous movement of the sheath from a capture position to a release position. Accordingly, the decision of the examiner to reject claim 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007