Ex parte BOUDRY et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-1978                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/898,905                                                  


               The appellants' invention relates to a disposable                      
          absorbent article having an improved fastenability about the                
          waist of a wearer (specification, p. 1).  A copy of the claims              
          under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellants'                
          brief.                                                                      


               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Le Bolt                  2,649,858                     Aug. 25,             
          1953                                                                        
          Polski                   5,066,289                     Nov. 19,             
          1991                                                                        
          Takemoto                 5,071,415                     Dec. 10,             
          1991                                                                        



               Claims 19 to 23 and 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                  
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Takemoto.                                  


               Claims 19 and 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)               
          as being anticipated by Le Bolt.                                            


               Claims 19 to 23 and 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                  
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Polski.                                    







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007