Appeal No. 2000-1980
Application No. 08/476,980
obviousness-type double patenting, the examiner should issue an appropriate Office
action setting forth the basis for such a rejection and provide appellant with the appropriate
opportunity to respond thereto.
Summary
The examiner's determination that the claims pending in this application are
unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) or, alternatively, under 35 U.S.C. § 103, is
reversed. The examiner's determination that the claims pending in this application are
unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 101 is reversed.
AFFIRMED
WILLIAM F. SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
DOUGLAS W. ROBINSON)
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
DONALD E. ADAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
MORRISON & FOERSTER
SUITE 5500
2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW
WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1888
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007