Appeal No. 2000-2015
Application 08/843,060
the above-noted rejection and the conflicting viewpoints
advanced by the examiner and appellant regarding the
rejection, we make reference to the final rejection (Paper No.
18, mailed August 6, 1999) and the examiner's answer (Paper
No. 21, mailed March 24, 2000) for the reasoning in support of
the rejection, and to
appellant’s brief (Paper No. 20, filed January 10, 2000) and
reply brief (Paper No. 22, filed May 25, 2000) for the
arguments thereagainst.
OPINION
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given
careful consideration to appellant’s specification and claims,
to the applied prior art references, and to the respective
positions articulated by appellant and the examiner. As a
consequence of our review, we have made the determination
which follows.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007