Ex Parte CONTE - Page 1



                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                        publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        
                                                            Paper No. 27              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                              Ex parte FRANCIS L. CONTE                               
                                   _____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2000-2033                                  
                               Application 08/331,851                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before PATE, STAAB, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is the second appeal of the final rejection of claims 1           
          and 4 through 15.  Claims 2 and 3 have been canceled.  These are            
          all the claims in the application.                                          
               In a first ex parte appeal, this board rendered a decision             
          on September 22, 1998 reversing all rejections of claims 1 and 4            
          through 15.  Subsequent to the appeal the examiner reopened                 
                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007