Appeal No. 2000-2035 Page 10 Application No. 08/844,282 provided between facing portions of the peripheral edges of the bifold membrane adjacent the top edges of the barrier walls. Once again, it is our view that the only suggestion for modifying Stanek in the manner proposed by the examiner to meet the above-noted limitations stems from hindsight knowledge derived from the appellants' own disclosure. It follows that we cannot sustain the examiner's rejections of claims 2, 6-8, 10, 11, 17 and 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Stanek in view of Lehmacher.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007