Appeal No. 2000-2061 Page 10
Application No. 08/463,843
SUMMARY
The rejection of claims 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 23, 25-27, 30, 34, 39-43, 46, 47 and 50-
52 as being unpatentable over Funck and Desma-Werke is not sustained.
The rejection of claims 17, 19, 22, 24, 29, 31-33 and 49 as being unpatentable over
Funck in view of Desma-Werke, Huh and Vibram is not sustained.
The rejection of claims 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 23, 25-27, 30, 34, 39-43, 46 and 47 as
being unpatentable over Makovski in view of Desma-Werke is not sustained.
The decision of the examiner is REVERSED.
IRWIN CHARLES COHEN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
NEAL E. ABRAMS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
LAWRENCE J. STAAB )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007