Ex parte ACKERMANN et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2000-2081                                                        
          Application 08/656,082                                                      


          Barrera                       4,901,433                Feb. 20,             
          1990                                                                        





          An additional reference cited by the examiner and relied                    
          upon as part of the 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph,                      
          rejection is:                                                               
          Balke                         3,157,939                Nov. 24,             
          1964                                                                        
          Claims 1, 2, 6, 8, 9, 14, 19, 21, 22, 27 through 29 and                     
          31 through 34 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                  
          paragraph as being indefinite for failing to particularly                   
          point out and distinctly claim that which appellants regard as              
          their invention.                                                            


          In addition to the foregoing rejection, the appealed                        
          claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and § 103 as                    
          follows:                                                                    




                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007