Appeal No. 2000-2108 Application No. 09/075,943 consequence of our review, we have made the determinations which follow. Looking first to the examiner's rejection of claims 2, 4 through 6, 8 through 14, 17 and 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Carroll in view Lazar, we note that independent claim 2 on appeal sets forth a vehicle hitch positioning apparatus which comprises a base plate (2) having a first hole (3) through which a trailer ball is inserted, the base plate being connected to the vehicle by said trailer ball (Fig. 2); a guide plate (5) having a lower ramped portion (5b) and an upper slanted portion (5a), with the upper slanted portion having a lower angle of inclination with respect to a horizontal plane than the lower ramped portion, said upper slanted portion (5a) having lateral sides being formed into winged guide portions (5c, 5d), the lower ramped portion (5b) being connected to the base plate for covering the base plate (Fig. 3), said upper slanted portion (5a) having a second hole (7) through which said trailer ball may be inserted, said guide plate guiding and supporting said trailer hitch into position over the second hole; and a movable catch (8) for 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007