Ex parte SATO et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-2139                                                        
          Application No. 08/938,704                                                  




               The references applied in the final rejection are:                     
               Beutler                            4,890,199           Dec.            
                                                                      26,             
                                                                      1989            
               Mendolia et al. (Mendolia)    5,717,577           Feb. 10,             
                                                                 1998                 
                                             (filed Oct. 30,                          
          1996)                                                                       
               Ito et al. (Ito)         JP 08-222881        Aug. 30, 19961            
               (Japanese Application)                                                 
               The admitted prior art shown in Fig. 5 of                              
               appellants’ application and described at page 1,                       
               line 12 to page 3, line 5. (APA)                                       
               The claims on appeal stand finally rejected under 35                   
          U.S.C. 103(a) as unpatentable over the following combinations               
          of  references:                                                             
               (1) Claim 9, Beutler in view of Mendolia and the APA.                  
               (2) Claims 11 and 12, Beutler in view of Mendolia, the                 
          APA, and Ito.                                                               
               First considering Beutler’s disclosure in relation to                  
          claim 9, Beutler discloses an electronic device (portable                   
          telephone) having a casing 201 containing a circuit board 205,              

               Although this reference (referred to as “Obayashi Katsuki”) is utilized1                                                                     
          in rejecting claims 11 and 12, it is not listed on page 3 of the examiner’s 
          answer.  A translation of the reference, prepared by the USPTO, is enclosed.
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007