Appeal No. 2000-2175 Page 11 Application No. 09/268,925 In view of the determinations made above that the words "HVAC plastic duct connector" as recited in claims 1 and 7 do give "life and meaning" and provide further positive limitations to the invention claimed, we conclude that the hose jacket of Meyer does not anticipate the subject matter of claims 1 and 7. Accordingly, the decision of the examiner to reject independent claims 1 and 7, and claims 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 9 dependent thereon, based on Meyer is reversed. The rejection based on Botsolas We will not sustain the rejection of claims 11-14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Botsolas. The record is clear that the examiner has given little or no patentable weight to the "providing" step of claim 11 or the "connecting" steps of claim 11 (see answer, p. 5). This is clearly in error. Under 35 U.S.C. § 103 all words in a claim must be considered in judging the patentability of that claim against the prior art. In re Wilson, 424 F.2d 1382, 1385, 165 USPQ 494, 496 (CCPA 1970). Furthermore, it is well established that the materials on which a process is carried out must bePage: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007