The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TIMOTHY RAYMOND HEINDEL, TIM JOSEPH JANSSEN, SCOTT LEE
PENNINGS, GARY MACK REYNOLDS, PAUL JOHN SERBIAK, BRUCE MICHAEL
SIEBERS, ROBERT EUGENE VOGT and GEORGIA LYNN ZEHNER
____________
Appeal No. 2000-2185
Application No. 08/834,777
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, STAAB and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 35, 43, 44, 48 and 50-57, which are all of
the claims pending in this application. Claims 35, 43, 44 and
48 were amended subsequent to the final rejection (see Paper
No. 7).
BACKGROUND
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007