Ex parte SWANN et al. - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 2000-2217                                                                                     Page 3                        
                 Application No. 09/067,287                                                                                                             


                                                                   BACKGROUND                                                                           
                          The appellants' invention relates to an apparatus for                                                                         
                 inflating an inflatable vehicle occupant protection device.  A                                                                         
                 substantially correct copy of the claims under appeal is set                                                                           
                 forth in the appendix to the appellants' brief.                                     3                                                  


                          The prior art references of record relied upon by the                                                                         
                 examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                                                                         
                 Evans et al.                                          3,082,691                                    Mar. 26,                            
                 1963                                                                                                                                   
                 (Evans)                                                                                                                                
                 Refouvelet et al.                                     5,576,509                                    Nov. 19,                            
                 1996                                                                                                                                   
                 (Refouvelet)                                                                                                                           
                 Mossi et al.                                          5,622,381                                    Apr. 22,                            
                 1997                                                                                                                                   
                 (Mossi)                                                                                                                                



                          Claims 14, 16, 18 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                                                       
                 § 103 as being unpatentable over Mossi in view of Evans and                                                                            
                 Refouvelet.                                                                                                                            




                          3A minor error in claim 16 was noted by the examiner                                                                          
                 (answer, p. 2).                                                                                                                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007