Appeal No. 2000-2230 Page 4
Application No. 08/706,767
Claims 15 to 34 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
first paragraph, as containing subject matter which was not
described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably
convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the appellants,
at the time the application was filed, had possession of the
claimed invention.
Claims 15 to 19, 21 and 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Scurrah in view of Tanaka.
Claim 20 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Scurrah in view of Tanaka as applied above,
and further in view of Berger.
Claims 23 and 24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Scurrah in view of Tanaka as applied
above, and further in view of Grover.
Claims 25 to 29, 31 and 32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Scurrah in view of Tanaka as
applied above, and further in view of Seidenberg or Fukushima.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007