Ex parte CHATILLION et al. - Page 2




                     Appeal No. 2001-0036                                                                                                                                              
                     Application 08/971,611                                                                                                                                            


                     advisory actions mailed, respectively, on February 4, 2000                                                                                                        
                     (Paper No. 14) and May 4, 2000 (Paper No. 19), the examiner                                                                                                       
                     has approved entry of both of the above-noted amendments.                                                                                                         
                     Accordingly, we make note that claims 2 and 4 through 19                                                                                                          
                     remain for our consideration in this appeal, while the appeal                                                                                                     
                     as to canceled claims 1 and 3 is dismissed.1                                                                                                                      


                                Appellants' invention relates to a support device for                                                                                                  
                     supporting a ski boot on a ski, and more particularly to a                                                                                                        
                     support device including a movable support element (e.g., 10                                                                                                      
                     in Figs. 2, 3, 4 and 6) which is movable, at least in a                                                                                                           
                     transverse direction, relative to a stationary support (e.g.,                                                                                                     
                     9 of Figs. 2, 3, 4 and 6) and an anti-friction element (e.g.,                                                                                                     
                     20 of Fig. 4) or elements (e.g., 200, 201a, 201r of Fig. 11 or                                                                                                    
                     201a, 201r of Figs. 15 or 16) located between the movable                                                                                                         


                                1 In reviewing the file history of this application, it                                                                                                
                     has come to our attention that claim 12 as amended in Paper                                                                                                       
                     No. 18 (April 21, 2000) has been mistakenly lined through as                                                                                                      
                     being replaced, when in fact the version of claim 12 as it                                                                                                        
                     appears in Paper No. 13 (January 24, 2000) is the one that                                                                                                        
                     should be lined through and replaced by the version of claim                                                                                                      
                     12 in Paper No. 18. This mistake should be corrected during                                                                                                       
                     any further prosecution of the application before the                                                                                                             
                     examiner.                                                                                                                                                         
                                                                                          2                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007