The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RICHARD WERSHE
____________
Appeal No. 2001-0090
Application No. 08/893,890
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, NASE, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection (Paper No. 8, mailed July 13, 1999) of claim 1. On
page 2 of the answer (Paper No. 14, mailed June 2, 2000), the
examiner allowed claims 7 to 12 and objected to claims 2, 3
and 6 as depending from a non-allowed claim. On page 5 of the
brief (Paper No. 11, filed March 20, 2000), the appellant
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007