Appeal No. 2001-0154 Application No. 08/838,266 The appellant’s invention is a bracket system capable of selectively supporting a curtain rod and a mini-blind. An understanding of the appealed subject matter can be derived form a reading of exemplary claims 1, which appears in the appendix to the appellant’s brief. The prior art The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Bellinger 4,226,395 Oct. 07, 1980 Corcoran 5,505,418 Apr. 09, 1996 The rejections Claims 1 through 6, and 9 through 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being clearly anticipated by Corcoran. Claims 7 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Corcoran in view of Bellinger. Claims 16 and 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Corcoran. Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and the appellant regarding the above-noted 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007