Ex parte BOLASNA et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-0165                                                        
          Application 08/893,220                                                      


               The claimed subject matter may be further understood by                
          reference to the appealed claims appended to appellants’                    
          brief.                                                                      


               The reference of record relied upon by the examiner as                 
          evidence of anticipation and obviousness is:                                
          Kawasaki et al. (Kawasaki)    5,513,056                Apr. 30,             
          1996                                                                        
                                      REJECTION                                       
               Claims 35-41 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as                
          anticipated by Kawasaki.                                                    
               Claim 42 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                      
          unpatentable over Kawasaki in view of appellants’ admitted                  
          prior art.                                                                  
               The rejections on appeal may be further understood with                
          reference to pages 2 and 3 of the final rejection, paper no.                
          9.                                                                          
               According to appellants, claims 35-41 stand or fall                    
          together, and these claims stand or fall separately from claim              
          42.                                                                         


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007