Appeal No. 2001-0212 Page 6
Application No. 08/958,497
claimed invention stems from hindsight knowledge derived from
the appellants' own disclosure. The use of such hindsight
knowledge to support an obviousness rejection under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 is, of course, impermissible. See, for example, W. L.
Gore and Assocs., Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d 1540, 1553,
220 USPQ 303, 312-13 (Fed. Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S.
851 (1984). It follows that we cannot sustain the examiner's
rejections of claims 8 to 13.
CONCLUSION
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007