Ex parte EBERLE, III - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 2001-0217                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 09/186,741                                                                                                             

                 German Patent Document1                                                                                                                


                                                             THE REJECTIONS                                                                             
                          Claims 27 through 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                                                                         
                 112, second paragraph, as failing to particularly point out                                                                            
                 and distinctly claim the subject matter the appellant regards                                                                          
                 as the invention.                                                                                                                      
                 Claims 18, 19 and 24 through 27 stand rejected under 35                                                                                
                 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Ellinwood in view                                                                           
                 of Bischof.                                                                                                                            
                          Claims 20 through 23, 28 and 29 stand rejected under 35                                                                       
                 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Ellinwood in view                                                                           
                 of Bischof and the German reference.                                                                                                   
                          Attention is directed to the appellant’s brief (Paper No.                                                                     
                 7) and to the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 8) for the                                                                                  
                 respective positions of the appellant and the examiner with                                                                            
                 regard to the merits of these rejections.                                                                                              




                          1An English language translation of this reference,                                                                           
                 prepared by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, is                                                                          
                 appended hereto.                                                                                                                       

                                                                           3                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007