Appeal No. 2001-0243 Application No. 09/001,285 pointed out by the examiner, the ordinary and accustomed definition of the term “lamp” is quite broad. For example, Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary (G. & C. Merriam Co. 1977) defines “lamp” as meaning “any of various devices for producing light or heat.” This definition is entirely consistent with the appellant’s specification and is certainly met by Lu’s TV set 72. The appellant also argues that Lu fails to meet the limitation in claim 13 requiring a “pivot mount” for moving the headrest from a first position generally co-planar with the back of the seat for directing illumination toward an area behind the headrest to a second position for directing illumination onto the rear surface of the back of the seat. As explained above, however, Lu’s TV set 72 is mounted in a pillow/headrest 60 which is pivotable through an angle of ± 90 degrees with respect to the plane of its backrest. It is not apparent, nor has the appellant cogently explained, why a TV set so mounted does not constitute a light source which is inherently capable of directing illumination in the manner recited in claim 13, as well as in claim 8, depending on the orientation of the headrest. 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007