Appeal No. 2001-0250 Page 26
Application No. 08/283,074
CONCLUSION
In summary, the rejection of claims 17, 42-46, 74, 77,
78, 80, and 91 under 35 U.S.C. § 112; the rejection of claims
1, 7, 10, 12, 15, 16, 18, 21, 23, 39, 67, 89, and 91 under 35
U.S.C. § 102(b); and the rejection of claims 11, 22, and 90
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are reversed. The rejections of claims
1-4, 6-12, 17, 20-24, 54-57, and 59-64 under 35 U.S.C. § 101;
the rejection of claims 18 and 73 under the doctrine of
obviousness-type double patenting; and the rejection of
claims 2-4, 6, 17, and 81-83 under § 103, however, are
affirmed.
Page: Previous 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007